活动人士Elliott希望德州仪器公司支持自由现金流。可能会出现一个友好的解决方案

时间:2024-09-29 编辑: 浏览:(232)

在这篇文章TXN关注你最喜欢的股票REATE FREE帐号 得克萨斯仪器股份有限公司的标志出现在伊利诺伊州Tiskilwa的科学计算器包上。Daniel Acker |彭博社|盖蒂图片社

公司:德州仪器(TXN)

商业:德州仪器是一家全球性的半导体公司。该公司为工业、汽车和个人电子产品等市场设计、制造、测试和销售模拟和嵌入式处理芯片。德州仪器的细分市场包括模拟和嵌入式处理。Analog的产品线包括电源和信号链。电源包括帮助客户管理电子系统电源的产品。信号链包括感知、调节和测量真实世界信号的产品,以允许信息传输或转换以进行进一步处理和控制。嵌入式处理领域包括微控制器、数字信号处理器和应用处理器。德州仪器还提供DLP产品,主要用于投影高清晰度图像,以及计算器和某些被称为专用集成电路的定制半导体。股票市值:17755亿美元(每股195.01美元) 股票图表图标股票图表图标德州仪器2024年业绩

活动家:Elliott Investment Management

持股比例:1.4%平均成本:不适用活动家评论:埃利奥特是一位非常成功和精明的活动家投资者。该公司的团队包括来自领先科技私募股权公司的分析师、工程师、运营合作伙伴——前科技首席执行官和首席运营官。在评估投资时,该公司还聘请专业和综合管理顾问、专业成本分析师和行业专家。埃利奥特在投资前经常观察公司多年,并拥有大量令人印象深刻的董事会候选人。该公司历来专注于技术领域的战略行动主义,并在这一策略上取得了很大成功。在过去的几年里,它的激进主义团体不断壮大。该公司一直在做更多以治理为导向的行动主义,在更广泛的公司中从董事会层面创造价值。

发生了什么

5月28日,Elliott宣布已持有德克萨斯仪器公司25亿美元的股份。它呼吁该公司采取动态产能管理战略,并在2026年引入每股9.00美元以上的自由现金流目标。

幕后

Texas Instruments is one of the most iconic semiconductor companies in the world, with a history dating back nearly a century. It was a pioneering company that invented numerous pillars of modern technology, including the integrated circuit in 1958, the handheld electronic calculator in 1967 and the digital signal processor in 1978. Today, Texas Instruments offers approximately 80,000 unique products in support of more than 100,000 customers with a portfolio of analog and embedded semiconductor offerings. The company positioned itself as a strategic and operational leader following decades of thoughtful strategic decisions and focusing on high-performance analog, one of the stickiest and highest-margin markets in semiconductors. Over the years, Texas Instruments has differentiated itself with a commitment to manufacturing as a core competitive advantage. It was the first analog semiconductor company to invest in 300-mm wafer production technology more than 15 years ago, which gave them a 40% cost-per-chip advantage relative to legacy 200-mm production. Today, Texas Instruments sources 80% of wafers internally, of which 40% are cost-advantaged 300-mm wafers. This investment in 300-mm technology resulted in gross margin expansion from 54% in 2010 to 63% in 2023. Additionally, the company has the world's biggest footprint of geopolitically dependable 300-mm analog manufacturing capacity, with 47% of global capacity outside of China and Taiwan and 85% of capacity in the U.S. Even though Texas Instruments has the No. 1 position in analog semiconductors, 74% exposure to the most attractive end markets (automotive and industrial), software-like margins (approximately 60% gross margins and approximately 40% operating margins), geopolitical security and company-owned manufacturing capacity, it has significantly underperformed peers in recent years. Elliott points the finger at the one metric that Texas Instruments has focused on for years as the best indicator of value and management performance – free cash flow per share. Elliott points out that the company's history supports this core principle: It grew free cash flow per share at an annual rate of 17% from 2006 to 2019 while the stock generated a roughly 440% total return, outperforming the S&P 500 by about 200% and analog semiconductor peers by around 135% during the period. During this time, prior to 2021, Texas Instruments spent an average of about 0 million per year in capex over the preceding decade, representing 5% of revenue. Then, the firm spent .5+ billion per year in 2021 and 2022. In 2022, the company announced that it would expand its manufacturing capacity with a plan that ultimately called for six new 300-mm fabrication facilities in the U.S. This plan calls for spending billion per year through 2026 and several billion dollars annually thereafter, equating to 23% of revenue, and would nearly triple Texas Instruments' internal manufacturing capacity by 2030. What did this do to free cash flow per share? Last year, the company generated only .47 per share in free cash flow – 77% lower than the prior year and 76% lower than five years ago. It's also below the free cash flow per share generated at the depths of the 2008-2009 financial crisis, when Texas Instruments' revenue was 40% below what it is today. Elliott does not have a problem with the company increasing capex to accommodate future growth and the 2022 plan, when announced, was not necessarily wrong. However, in 2022, consensus expectations for 2026 revenue were billion. Today, expectations have declined by 24% to billion, which has Texas Instruments now spending billions of dollars to build to a 50% excess capacity. Elliott is asking for the company to do what it had done for years and what the industry does and what economic logic dictates – to modulate capex spend based on demand. Elliott does not even take credit for this plan; the firm uses the company's own history as a blueprint. In 2003, Texas Instruments chose a site in Richardson, Texas to build the world's first 300-mm analog fab, known as RFAB 1, in the midst of a semiconductor industry downturn. The company said that it would initially build the facility's shell and then gradually outfit the facility with equipment in accordance with customer demand, as the equipment is 80% of the cost of the plant and a shell building could be fully equipped within six months to meet demand. RFAB 1 largely sat dormant for the next roughly five years and shipped its first products for revenue from in 2010, with Texas Instruments' management frequently saying that RFAB "will ramp up consistent with demand." Elliott suggests that the company adopt a dynamic capacity-management strategy and introduce a free cash flow per share target of .00+ in 2026, representing a level that is about 40% above current investor expectations. The firm thinks that a commitment to prudent capital discipline will restore investors' confidence, while providing Texas Instruments with flexibility to achieve this target through a combination of strong organic growth, market share gains and sensible capacity management. Elliott is not asking the company to cut 2024 or 2025 capex. The firm simply recommends that the company decrease 2026 capex to .75 billion if there is no increase in consensus revenue projections or keep it at .0 billion if Texas Instruments can increase its market share by 250 basis points. In either case, Elliott thinks the company can achieve .01 of free cash flow per share. The company's capex plan has decimated free cash flow per share and is building to a 50% excess capacity. Elliott's plan restores the free cash flow per share growth and still builds to a 30% or 39% excess capacity. The company might argue that Elliott is being a "short-term minded activist," but Elliott's plan creates short-term value without sacrificing any long-term opportunities or value. It arguably creates more long-term value than the company's plan. Texas Instruments' performance and capex plan is exacerbated by its poor market communication. Free cash flow is down 77% due to an aggressive capex plan, and the company has not publicly laid out a detailed plan or made a case as to why they need 50% excess capacity. This is such an easy ask, one has to wonder why Elliott has not worked this out with management before having to resort to a public letter. The firm supports the company's strategy. It supports management, and it supports capex for 2024 and 2025, but there is no evidence that Elliott requested a meeting with management prior to sending this letter. Sometimes the process is as important as the content, and Elliott would have a much better chance of persuading management had it approached the company privately. A proxy fight at a company like this would be a Herculean task for any activist, but if there is any activist with the resources and conviction to do it, it is Elliott. Given the firm's reasonable ask and its support for management outside of this one inexplicable capex decision, we would expect this to settle amicably. We do not see Elliott getting one of their people on this board, but it could use some independent industry executives. Elliott does not go into a situation like this without a Rolodex of industry professionals with whom it consults and who would be available for board duty. If the company thinks it can ignore Elliott, it would be mistaken. But if Texas Instruments needs any additional evidence of Elliott's conviction outside of the firm's history, Elliott has built a .5 billion position here, which is big by even the firm's standards. Ken Squire is the founder and president of 13D Monitor, an institutional research service on shareholder activism, and the founder and portfolio manager of the 13D Activist Fund, a mutual fund that invests in a portfolio of activist 13D investments.

最新 更多 >
  • 1 XLM币是什么?XLM币最近行情如何?

    什么是XLM币?Stellar Lumens(简称XLM),是一种基于区块链技术的加密货币。它是由Jed McCaleb于2014年创建的,旨在为全球金融系统提供快速、低费用和安全的资金转移和交易。与其他加密货币不同,XLM的目标并不是成为一种独立的数字货币,而是搭建一种连接各种货币和支付系统的桥梁。XLM币的特点XLM币的特点之一是其快速的交易速度。通过使用其独有的共识算法,XLM网络能够在短时

  • 2 狗狗币和屎币哪个值得投资

    狗狗币和屎币:两个极具争议的数字货币数字货币市场一直以来都备受关注,除了比特币和以太坊这些大名鼎鼎的币种外,狗狗币和屎币也渐渐进入了人们的视野。这两个币种都有着独特的特点和巨大的潜力,然而对于投资者来说,哪个更值得投资呢?下面我们将对狗狗币和屎币进行一些比较,来帮助您做出决策。狗狗币:从玩笑走向现实狗狗币最初是作为一种玩笑币种而诞生的,它的名字和标志都源于一个互联网迷因:狗狗表情包。然而,狗狗币的

  • 3 uxt币是什么?uxt币最近行情如何?

    什么是UXT币UXT币(全称为Unity Token)是一种基于区块链技术的加密货币。它是由Unity Wallet发行的数字资产,旨在提供更安全、快速、便捷的支付和转账方式。UXT币的目标是通过去中心化的区块链技术来改变传统的金融体系,使资金的流动更加高效和透明。UXT币的特点1. 去中心化:UXT币基于区块链技术,没有中心化的管理机构,使得交易更加安全和隐私。2. 快速交易:使用UXT币可以实

  • 4 LINA币是什么?LINA币最近行情如何?

    LINA币是什么?LINA币是一种基于区块链技术发行的数字货币,它是由LINA网络推出的加密货币代币。与其他加密货币不同,LINA币的设计目标是为全球供应链金融提供解决方案。通过将区块链与供应链金融相结合,LINA币旨在提高供应链金融的效率、透明度和安全性。供应链金融是指支持供应链各个环节的资金流转和结算的金融服务。然而,传统的供应链金融存在着问题,如高昂的中间商费用、复杂的流程以及信息不对称等。

  • 5 htb币是什么?htb币最近行情如何?

    HTB币是什么?HTB币,全称是HackTheBox Token,是目前在黑客社区中备受关注的数字货币之一。HackTheBox是一个为黑客和安全专家提供训练和挑战的平台,HTB币便是该平台专门针对其成员内部所使用的虚拟货币。HTB币可以通过完成HackTheBox平台上的各种任务和挑战来获得,这些任务和挑战涵盖了各种安全领域,包括网络安全、系统攻防等。只有通过解决任务和挑战,黑客才能够获得HTB

  • 6 shlb和狗狗币买哪个好

    购买SHIB和狗狗币,哪个更好?加密货币市场一直是投资者热衷的领域之一,近年来出现了许多备受关注的数字货币。其中,SHIB和狗狗币是两个备受争议的热门币种。那么,购买SHIB和狗狗币,哪个更值得投资呢?让我们来一起探讨一下。关于SHIBSHIB是Shiba Inu社区发起的一个类比特币的加密货币项目。它是一种基于以太坊区块链的代币,主要通过“ShibaSwap”平台进行交易。SHIB的市值在短短的

  • 7 狗狗币和比特币哪个好一点

    狗狗币和比特币哪个更好?随着加密货币市场的迅速发展,人们开始关注各种不同的数字货币。在这些数字货币中,狗狗币和比特币无疑是最受关注和讨论的两种。这两种数字货币有着不同的特点和用途,下面将对它们进行比较,看看哪个更好。狗狗币的优势狗狗币是一种基于比特币的区块链技术发展而来的加密货币。它的最大优势在于社区与网络的支持。狗狗币凭借其独特的社区精神和社交媒体的推广,吸引了广大用户的关注和参与。无论是小额支

  • 8 涂鸦币和狗狗币哪个合适

    涂鸦币和狗狗币:哪个更合适?在加密货币市场中,涂鸦币和狗狗币是两个备受关注的数字资产。它们都有自己独特的特点和背后的社区支持。那么,在这两者之间,哪个更合适?让我们深入了解它们的特点和用途来找出答案。涂鸦币 - 打造数字艺术品市场的未来涂鸦币是一个基于区块链技术的加密货币,致力于推动数字艺术品市场的发展。它的目标是通过将艺术品和区块链技术相结合,为数字艺术家提供更好的版权保护和艺术品交易平台,促进

  • 9 ghx币是什么?ghx币最近行情如何?

    GHX币是什么?GHX币是一种基于区块链技术的加密货币。GHX代表着Global Healthcare Exchange,是一个专为医疗行业设计的数字货币。作为医疗供应链中的数字化解决方案,GHX币旨在简化医疗机构之间的采购和付款流程,并提供更安全、透明和高效的交易方式。GHX币的特点和优势GHX币的特点和优势主要体现在以下几个方面:1. 高度安全性:GHX币基于区块链技术,采用去中心化的方式存储

  • 10 无 限币和狗狗币哪个好

    无限币 vs 狗狗币:谁是更好的投资选择?近年来,加密货币市场迅速发展,并涌现出许多新的数字资产。其中,无限币(Infinitecoin)和狗狗币(Dogecoin)是两个备受关注的币种。无限币和狗狗币都有其独特的特点和优势,但究竟哪个更值得投资呢?本文将从几个方面对无限币和狗狗币进行比较,帮助读者更好地了解这两种数字资产。1. 技术实力和发展潜力在技术实力方面,无限币和狗狗币有着不同的特点。无限